ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is a diagnostic tool for evaluating various cardiac conditions, such as myocarditis and myocardial infiltrative diseases. It is also the gold standard screening technique for detecting allograft rejection after heart transplantation. Despite advances in noninvasive imaging modalities for myocardial tissue characterization, EMB is still necessary for making a definitive diagnosis and determining treatment for certain conditions. Herein, we report our recent experience using EMB and its diagnostic yield. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively reviewed EMBs performed at our institution from March 2018 through March 2023. Clinical data, including patient characteristics, indication and diagnostic yield of EMB, and procedure-related complications were collected. Histopathological findings of the biopsies were recorded and classified based on the degree to which they matched the clinical diagnosis and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) findings. A total of 212 EMBs obtained in 178 consecutive patients were retrospectively analyzed, with 42 biopsies performed for allograft rejection surveillance (10 patients) and the remaining performed for presumptive diagnosis of acute myocarditis or unexplained cardiomyopathy. Among the non-heart transplant cases, 54.7% of EMBs provided a clear diagnosis. The most common diagnosis was myocarditis (69%), followed by cardiac amyloidosis (CA) (26%). EMB was also helpful in detecting several rare cardiac conditions, such as eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA), Fabry disease, and cardiac sarcoidosis. In a cohort of 101 patients who underwent both CMR and EMB, the results were concordant in 66% of cases. However, in 24.7% of patients, EMB was able to identify pathological conditions where CMR results were inconclusive, highlighting its complementary role in determining the accurate diagnosis. No complications were reported in any of the 212 EMBs performed. CONCLUSIONS: With advances in cardiac imaging modalities, EMB is not routinely indicated for the diagnosis of cardiomyopathy. However, EMB is still an important tool for diagnosing specific cardiac diseases and could be crucial for confirming the diagnosis. EMB is generally safe if performed at experienced centers.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) are considered the gold standard for COVID-19 diagnosis. These tests require professional manpower and equipment, long processing and swab sampling which is unpleasant to the patients. Several volatile organic compounds (VOCs) have been identified in the breath of COVID-19 patients. Detection of these VOCs using a breath test could help rapidly identify COVID-19 patients. OBJECTIVE: Assess the accuracy of 'Breath of Health' (BOH) COVID-19 Fourier-transform infra-red (FTIR) Spectroscopy-based breath test. METHODS: Breath samples from patients with or without symptoms suggestive for COVID-19 who had NAAT results were collected using Tedlar bags and were blindly analysed using BOH FTIR spectroscopy. BOH Measures several VOCs simultaneously and differentiating positive and negative results. BOH results were compared to NAAT results as gold standard. RESULTS: Breath samples from 531 patients were analysed. The sensitivity of BOH breath test was found to be 79.5% and specificity was 87.2%. Positive predictive value (PPV) was 74.7% and negative predictive value (NPV) 90.0%. Calculated accuracy rate was 84.8% and area under the curve 0.834. Subgroup analysis revealed that the NPV of patients without respiratory symptoms was superior over the NPV of symptomatic patients (94.7% vs 80.7%, P-value < 0.0001) and PPV of patients with respiratory symptoms outranks the PPV of individuals without symptoms (85.3% vs 69.2%, P-value 0.0196). CONCLUSION: We found BOH COVID-19 breath test to be a patient-friendly, rapid, non-invasive diagnostic test with high accuracy rate and NPV that could efficiently rule out COVID-19 especially among individuals with low pre-test probability.
